چکیده:
زمینه و هدف:: امروزه، اهمیت سرمایههای انسانی در شرکتهای دولتی افزایشیافته و رهبران سازمانی نقشی تعیینکننده در ارتقای سلامت کارکنان در محیطهای کاری دارند که در این راستا مفهوم "رهبری سلامتمحور" در مباحث علمی مطرح شده است. باتوجهبه اینکه مفهومسازی دقیقی از آن وجود ندارد، هدف تحقیق حاضر طراحی مدل رهبری سلامتمحور در شرکتهای دولتی است. روششناسی: در این پژوهش که از نظر روششناسی در زمره تحقیقات کیفی قرار میگیرد که از تئوری داده بنیاد برای طراحی مدل استفاده شد. بدین منظور با 24 نفر از خبرگان اجرایی در شرکتهای دولتی و خبرگان دانشگاهی که به صورت هدفمند انتخاب شدند، مصاحبه نیمهساختاریافته به عمل آمد. یافتهها: بر اساس یافتهها، 6 دسته عوامل شامل عوامل علی، رهبری سلامتمحور (پدیده محوری)، عوامل زمینهای، عوامل مداخلهگر، راهبردها و پیامدها شناسایی شد. همچنین، سه بعد نگرشی سلامت کارکنان، عملی سلامت کارکنان و سلامت فردی رهبر برای رهبری سلامتمحور شناسایی شد. نتایج: بر اساس یافتهها، بررسی رهبری سازمانی از رویکرد سلامتمحور، میتواند چارچوبی سیستمی و جامع ارائه دهد و بهنوعی تئوریهای موجود در زمینه رهبری سازمانی را در قالبی جدید قرار دهد. نهایتا، نتایج نشان داد که رهبری سلامتمحور در شرکتهای دولتی پدیدهای چندوجهی است که بهرهگیری از آن میتواند نتایج مثبت و ارزشمندی ایجاد کند.
A B S T R A C T Background and Aim: Today, the importance of human resources in state-owned firms has increased and there is a need to provide appropriate mental and physical conditions for their activities. Evidence shows that organizational leaders have a decisive role in promoting employee health in the workplace, The concept of " Health-oriented leadership " has been introduced in scientific discussions. Considering that there is no precise conceptualization of it, the purpose of this study is to design a model of Health-oriented leadership in state-owned firms. Methodology: This research, is considered among the qualitative research. that foundation grounded theory method was used to design the model. For this purpose, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 executive experts in state-owned firms and university experts who were purposefully selected. Results: Based on the findings, 6 categories of factors were identified including causal factors, health-oriented leadership (pivotal phenomenon), underlying factors, intervening factors, strategies and consequences. Also, three attitudinal dimensions of employee health, practical employee health and personal health of the leader for Health-oriented leadership were identified. Conclusion: Based on the findings, examining organizational leadership from a health-oriented approach can provide a systematic and comprehensive framework and somehow put the existing theories in the field of organizational leadership in a new format. Finally, the results showed that health-oriented leadership in state-owned firms is a multifaceted phenomenon, the use of which can create positive and valuable results. Extended Abstract Introduction Today, the health of human resources in organizations has become a very relevant and important issue. When appropriate measures are implemented in this area, health leads to a higher level of employee vitality and commitment and ensures a high level of health and well-being of employees more than the organization, and also negative health outcomes such as experiencing stress and burnout of employees play an important role. There is evidence that workplaces are increasingly reported by employees as stressful places. Yao et al. (2021) also point out in their research that employee health not only has a positive relationship with employee well-being and family happiness but also affects organizations and the entire society. Leaders who adopt health-oriented leadership can improve health. and have a positive effect on the well-being of their employees The main advantage of the concept of health-oriented leadership is that it leads to specific practical signs of health to promote the health of followers. Leaders who engage in health-oriented leadership enhance social resources by creating a sense of mutual support and team cohesion. There is limited research that points to health-oriented leadership interventions in the public sector as a factor that leads to improved employee health. On the other hand, the conducted research shows that 46% of the failures of state-owned companies in making organizational change and improvement are due to incorrect leadership. Therefore, successful organizations need leaders who, with deep insight, determine the appropriate direction and future path of the organization, guide people to the path, and create the motivation to create transformation in employees. The mentioned cases double the necessity of changing and using a health-oriented leadership style in public companies. Therefore, the current research has taken into consideration the design of the health-oriented leadership model in public companies. In general, this research seeks to answer these question: "What is the paradigm model of health-oriented leadership in State-Owned Firms. Methodology The purpose of the research is to design a health-oriented leadership model in public companies. The current research fundamental type of research in terms of its purpose. By the way, this research is a qualitative type of research. The foundational data theory method was used in the research method. The reason for using the foundational data theory method in this research is that in the field of health-oriented leadership, no research provides a comprehensive model of health-oriented leadership and factors and strategies related to it, based on the researcher's investigations. In the qualitative phase, 24 academic and executive experts were interviewed. Results and discussion In the current research, to collect data for designing a health-oriented leadership model in public companies, semi-structured interviews with experts were used and the data were analyzed using the foundational data theory method. Foundation data theory includes three stages open coding, axial coding, and selective coding. In the present research, open coding was done after conducting interviews with experts and after reviewing the full text of the interviews. After open coding, axial coding was done, and after open coding and axial coding, selective coding was done. Conclusion In the current research, six categories of factors were identified based on the Strauss and Corbin (1998) paradigm model, including causal factors, health-oriented leadership (phenomenon-oriented), background factors, intervening factors, strategies, and consequences. Generally, in this research, according to validity and reliability, they showed that the research model is approved; Based on the research findings, health-oriented leadership consists of three attitudinal dimensions employee health, practical employee health, and the leader's health. In other words, health-oriented leadership can be defined as "a set of attitudes and approaches as well as practical actions that improve the health level of employees and leaders in work and organizational environments". The conceptualization of Yao et al. (2021) and Jimenez et al. (2017), have emphasized more on the behavioral aspects of health-oriented leadership; However, in the past researchers' conceptualizations of health-oriented leadership, personal health of the leader has been less considered, which is considered as one of the three dimensions of health-oriented leadership in this research. Finally, the results showed that health-oriented leadership in State-Owned Firms is a multifaceted phenomenon that can produce positive and valuable results. Funding There is no funding support. Authors’ Contribution All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work. Conflict of Interest Authors declared no conflict of interest. Acknowledgments We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.