چکیده:
Among the significant issues of the subcontinental region, one can refer to the concern over Pakistan’s inability to maintain the security of its nuclear facilities, the illegal increase in its nuclear weapon production, extremist organizations’ access to nuclear weapons, as well as the fact that this country has not joined the NPT treaty. Meanwhile, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which was created to fulfill the two aims of promoting peaceful applications of nuclear power and preventing nuclear activities from edging toward military purposes, can play an effective role- within the framework of its legal authority- in preventing the potential threats of Pakistan’s nuclear activities from actualizing. Therefore, the main question of the present research concern the strong and weak points of the IAEA’s performance toward Pakistan’s nuclear activities. The findings of this essay will demonstrate the undesirability of the Agency accomplishments (drawing up several safeguard agreements), in comparison with its deficiencies, including cases such as the Agency’s silence regarding the uptrend in Pakistan’s nuclear weapons production, failing to persuade Pakistan to join the NPT, being affected by the great powers in observing Pakistan’s nuclear activities, as well as incorrect estimations of the security of its nuclear programs.
خلاصه ماشینی:
He believed that countries are rational actors who need 227 {مراجعه شود به فایل جدول الحاقی} 228 {مراجعه شود به فایل جدول الحاقی} Hossein Moein Abadi Bidgoli and Mohammad Davand to seek nuclear weapons in order to guarantee their own security in the international system, as well as to keep their potential enemies at bay (Sajād Pur & Karimi Qahrudi, 1390 [2011 A.
A Review of the Performance of the International Atomic Energy Agency Regarding Pakistan’s Nuclear Activities The United States of America strongly condemned the experiments and made fruitless efforts to dissuade Pakistan from following India’s example.
Examples of such groups would be Sipah-e-Sahaba, which does not count Shiites as Muslims and considers its duty to oppose A Review of the Performance of the International Atomic Energy Agency Regarding Pakistan’s Nuclear Activities Pakistani Shiites and to fight the Shia revolution of Iran (South Asian Terrorism Portal, 2013), as well as Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, the most dangerous group among the existing powerful and violent groups in Pakistan, which means to eliminate Shia beliefs (Australia Government, 2013).
At the same time, however, the Indian army prepared itself through training for the possibility of using A Review of the Performance of the International Atomic Energy Agency Regarding Pakistan’s Nuclear Activities nuclear weapons against Pakistan (Mian & Ramna, 2003).
Third, according to different documents, among them the reports of the Congressional Research Service of the United States (CRS), Pakistan has increased its production of nuclear warheads, while the IAEA A Review of the Performance of the International Atomic Energy Agency Regarding Pakistan’s Nuclear Activities has chosen to remain silent about this.