خلاصة:
The term quot;Wittgenstein fideism belong to Nielsen, who attributed a position to pupils or followers of Wittgenstein and later to Wittgenstein himself. quot;Wittgenstein fideism have, more than anyone else religion current, stressed the relativity of beliefs and their relation to the forms of life in which they originate. Thus; religious belief is neither rational nor irrational absolutely and logically; but they have unique trait because of their relevancies to special to language - games and form of life. Wittgenstein's fideism believes the logical discourse is sui generis and therefore cannot be understood and judged in terms other than its own. The present study will aim to investigate this claimant using by few opponents and followers view.
ملخص الجهاز:
quot;Wittgenstein fideism have, more than anyone else religion current, stressed the relativity of beliefs and their relation to the forms of life in which they originate.
Thus; religious belief is neither rational nor irrational absolutely and logically; but they have unique trait because of their relevancies to special to language - games and form of life.
Among the various English philosophical currents that have dealt with religion, quot;Wittgensteinian faddists have, more than anyone else, stressed the relativity of beliefs and their relation to the forms of life in which they originate( Bottone ,2001).
Religious belief is a language game, a form of life that establishes its own internal criteria of meaning and of rationality.
4. Critics of fideism Apart from Kai Nelson, other critics of fideism such as Cook, Copestone, Hick, Kenny, Mounce, Pasmore, Patrice Sherry and others raise questions against Wittgenstein's view whichholds that religion has its own language-game and form of life.
(2) According to Nelson, the stronger argument against Fideism that is: 'religious language - game and form of life are distinct and hence they cannot be examined as per the criterion of the non- religious meaning fulness but as per the criterion of religion itself', is inadequate because the so called religious.
For Nelson religious language-game and form of life cannot be treated to be a subjective truth as they entail some kind of universal objectivity.