خلاصة:
Since stem cell has the potential to produce any type of cell and tissue in the human body, it
has a special place in genetic engineering and medical restoration. But this technology has
had its own scientific and ethical implications in various communities which some would
call it the "challenge of the century". In the meantime, ethics and sociology scholars,
jurisprudent and law scholars, as well as Catholic, Orthodox, and Jewish scholars and some
Muslims presented strong opposition against the techniques due to destruction of the embryo
and the sanctity of potential human life, inflicting harm to women which give egg, Contrary
to the teachings of divine rules and the rules as “do not harm” and disruption in the system
and the rule “there should be neither harming nor reciprocating harm” demanded to stop
researching in this regard. But on the other hand, some scholars accepted this according to
the Ebahe (principle of permissibility), and the tazahom (principle of conflict) but some
others believed that preventing from stem cell research for some its misuses and potential
effects is wrong. And believedthat it is necessary to establish appropriate rules, regulatory
guidelines and developing moral solutions in the field. In this approach, the extraction of
stem cells from embryos in vitro outside the womb for therapeutic and research
applications- considering the potential of this researches to cure disease and reduce human
suffering, it seems to be prescribed based on the occurrence of all these techniques outside
the womb and those reasons for preventingare related to the destruction of potential life after
implantation in the womb and the relevance of uterus But it must be legislated to create
necessary restrictions and prevent misuse of the embryo and its giver.
ملخص الجهاز:
And prior to this, we should resolve the Juridical and legal issues regarding researches like: Violation the human dignity of the embryo and a few days cell mass, the origin of life and the beginning of human personality, the necessity of protecting cells in vitro and ...
All those who has an idea about the stem cell research and the question of the legitimacy and illegitimacy of research on early embryos, At least certainly, believes that the life of a human organism, in whatever form it takes, possess intrinsic value.
However it requires the abandonment of any new experience and to refrain from any test Arguments of Advocates A) The lack of necessity for protecting the potential life of the embryo It must be noted that since in general and absolutely the embryo is referred to different stages of evolution,this idea has emerged that the thingis destroyed in order to obtain stem cells is embryo; while the thing is Just a formed mass of cells which often is extracted before 14 days.
According to Islamic jurisprudence, the fetus which is still in the early stages is not transferred to the uterus, whether it is cloned using SCNT or produced in IVF process not deal with religious Commandments Such as the necessity of preserving and the prohibition of violation and there is no problem toresearchand extract stem cells before being transferred to the womb because the reasons related to the prohibition of abortion and the need for compensation payments are related to the establishment and after implantation in the uterus.