خلاصة:
Problem statement: Among the various branches of architecture, the monuments of the
tomb have a special place; therefore, the tombs after the mosques are the most common
building in Iran and have rooted in the context and culture of Iran. The tomb’s health of
a large number of Characters, especially scholars and mystics are unknown, and even in
many cases, the date of death and the place of death has not been considered. The Harmony
building in the Old Town of Toos is one of the buildings where there is a lot of ambiguity
about the exact operation and construction history.
Purpose and method of the research: The main topic in this article is the elimination of
these ambiguities and the recognition of the Harmony building, by reviewing written and
non-textual sources (library-documentary and field) and comparative study and comparing
it with other similar and contemporary works. The type of research in this article is
descriptive-analytic and historical content.
The Result of the Research: based on what has previously been mentioned, it can be
concluded that Haroonia is a building that was built in the 8th century AD and during
the rule of the Shi’ite ruler of Sarbadārs dynasty, in order to burial one of the ancients
and dervishes of this dynasty. Political conflicts and power struggles and the early fall of
Sarbadārs in the eighth century AH led to the unfinished construction, and after some time,
its historical and religious signs were destroyed by subsequent governments, and it was
recognized in Haroonia without any historical backing.
ملخص الجهاز:
Tabatabaee (1974: 10), Mehdi Seyyedi (1960: 26), Rajabali Labaf Khaniki (1999: 65), and Seyyed Mohsen Hosseini (1995: 49) have tried to investigate and The analysis of the ambiguities is based on which significant results have been obtained; also, (VIEW the Image this page) [%%ابتدای جدول%%, Research background, , Map 1.
Among Iranian researchers,, , , , be deduced from a number of travel writings of, , in recent decades, people like Mohammad Mohit, , , , the QĀJĀR period, such as Fraser (1825: 517), , , , , , , , Khannikov (1996: 121) and Etemad al-Saltanah, , , , (1983: 181) By the QĀJĀR period, there were, , , , other architectural monuments around the building,, , , , including a minaret or four-story castle.
%%انتهای جدول%%] The Scientific Journal of NAZAR research center (Nrc) for Art, Architecture & Urbanism transformation of the Haroonia building in order to determine the performance, identity and duration of the construction of this building, the research method is consistent with the descriptive-analytical methods and historical analysis, as a documentary and library study based on resources of written texts, especially historical and geographical and non-written sources and field studies.
Architectural history approach In recent decades, some scholars such as Hertzfeld (1969: 10), Hill and Grabar(1996: 84, 85), HillenBrand (1998: 357) have considered the building as a Seljuk monument without providing any documentary evidence.