خلاصة:
The encounter of a publicist with language is not similar to a linguist, literate, philosopher and logician. Limitations and ambiguities of the natural language in formulation of legal concepts and explanation of realities and values of international law cause the publicist to exceed the real boundaries of law knowledge. Therefore, in a context of logics, linguistics, and linguistic analytic philosophy, the publicist presents concepts, propositions, texts, rationalism models, and legal theories and attempts to recognize nature, type, and rational implications of them. This means that legal language must have phenomenal expressiveness capacity, exploration of meaning and decoding of legal texts for the exact description of realities and facts of collective life and should also represent and codify legal necessities and values. Legal language that is a special type of natural languages, just like any other natural language and even more than others, does not have degrees of certainty, precision level, and transparency that is found in symbolic and formal languages that logicians have used it in order to explain relations in context of mathematics, logics, and modern physics based on formal rationalism. However, international law faces a more difficult test that recognizes dialogism, multiplicity of readings, and diversity of meanings, it gets degraded through the suppressive language of arrogant speakers.
ملخص الجهاز:
Limitations and ambiguities of the natural language in formulation of legal concepts and explanation of realities and values of international law cause the publicist to exceed the real boundaries of law knowledge.
Therefore, in a context of logics, linguistics, and linguisticanalytic philosophy, the publicist presents concepts, propositions, texts, rationalism models, and legal theories and attempts to recognize nature, type, and rational implications of them.
Keywords Legal Language, Analytic and Synthetic Propositions, Dialogism, Communicative Rationality, Meaning, Text, Explanation, Monologue, Polyphony Test Department of Public Law, College of law, Assistant Professor, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran / Email: f.
ir Introduction Fundamentally, legal language is a type of natural languages that despite dominance of Aristotle logics on history of epistemology and methodology of international law Science has not been much successful in formation of a language free from overt and hidden ambiguities in legal propositions and concepts.
Of course, complex interaction of value reality in form of legal positivism paradigm that merely includes discovery of possible and definitive symmetry as causative among legal phenomena and reduction of legal system to legal rules, is an obstacle to development and optimal evolution of substructures of legal language that has decreased capability of codification and representation and decoding of dialectic among these levels of reality, validity, rationalism models and optimal understanding of legal texts in context of legal logics and linguistics of international law Science.