ملخص الجهاز:
Key words: principle of determination of one’s own future, International Court of Justice, basic criminal law, separation-seeking, territorial integrity.
An Analysis of Ayatollah Khoei’s Objections to the Arguments Concerning Velâyat-e Faqih (Guardianship of Religious Jurist) Ali Gholami / Associate Professor, Faculty of Islamic Studies and Law, Imam Sadiq University a.
student, Public Law, Islamic Azad University; science and Research Brunch Tehran Received: 2019/06/29 - Accepted: 2019/12/06 Abstract The history of the discussion and arguments concerning Velâyat-e Faqih goes back to the early development of Shiite Fiqh (jurisprudence).
ir Ali Taheri-Dehnavi / Master’s Degree in Jurisprudence and Principles of Islamic Law, Shiraz University Received: 2019/07/12 - Accepted: 2019/12/10 Abstract With the advances which occurred in the different aspects of life and emergence of the conditions that did not exist at the time of the proclamation of religion, it is felt that there is an increasing need for legislation.
The very compulsion in referring to arbitration has led some to hold that it is contrary to Article 34 of the Constitution and individuals’ right of going to court, and the most important reason for rejecting it may be the Guardian Council’s approval of the laws governing the types of compulsory arbitration; because, according to the Article 72 of the Constitution, the Guardian Council is the official authority for ensuring the compatibility of the pieces of legislation passed by the Islamic Consultative Assembly with the Constitution.