ملخص الجهاز:
” I also main tain that the peace-loving Muslim majority hasthe moral right and intellectual prerogative to denounce this violent minority and to get their denunciation ap preciated and deemed supreme.
g. , violent extremists, peace loving Muslims, and the non-Muslim global community), it may be of even greater importance to these groups, for their entire reason d’être is firmly an chored in their “Islamicness.
The peace-loving Muslim majority’s depiction of violent extremists and their activities as un-Islamic is both a religio-political necessity and self-serving.
But this same majority is fully justified in portraying violent extremists and their activities as un-Islamic because the latter claim to be doing everything in the name of Islam and for Muslims.
Ironically, these intellectuals and pseudo-experts feel comfortable agreeing with the violent extremists than with the majority of peace-loving Muslims.
My own research on the interpretation of the Qur’an’s peace verses con firms the extremists’ selective use of sources and the superiority of the major ity’s comprehensive approach.
Journalists and analysts like Graeme Wood would consider those justifications and actions “very Islamic” simply because they are based on the “coherent and even learned interpretation of Islam.
12 In his commentary on the peace verses, Sayyid Qutb selectively cited Qatadah’s opinion and ignored not only the other medieval commentators (i.
Based on the above case study, the peace-loving Muslim majority has a better argument morally, religiously and politically than does the un-Islamic extremist minority.