خلاصه ماشینی:
"The claim essentially is that the register analysis operates on the wrong unit: the analysts isolate forms rather than functions, and develop grammatical rather than communicative competence,(b)register analysis is concerned with the quantitative linguistic analysis of text in terms of what linguistic elements are used in the manifestation of language system, whereas rhetorical analysis makes qualitative analysis about how the linguistic forms realize in the manifestation of functions and concepts,(c)rhetorical considerations determine grammatical choices, and(d)English scientific rhetoric covers a range of seemingly similar genres, such as research papers, technical manuals, textbooks, etc.
2 Proportion of Identified Focal Techniques in Different Texts(%) >CS< PH physics CH chemistry BO botany ZO zoology SE geology GO geography SO sociology EC a economics LI Bterature PA painting 1 natural time order 2 natural space order 3 natural cause & result 4 logical order 5 logical cause & result 6 compare & contrast 7 exemplification 8 illustration s 9 conditional cause & result 10 justification 11 analogy 12 clarification Distribution of identified communicative acts is offered in Fig. 4.
01 between English discourse of science across a variety of disciplines/subjects in terms of(a)the way texts are patterned for development,(b)of the focal communicative acts performed as the main intention of the discourse producer and(c)of the focal techniques employed to serve the easy and smooth conveyance of that main intention(see Table 4.
A number of applied linguists on the assumption that the language of physics, for example, is a register different from that of, say, sociology in terms of lexicon and structures, propose a narrow approach to teaching EST which focuses on discipline-specific features of scientific English."