چکیده:
ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ درﺻﺪد ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ﻣﻔﻬﻮم ﻣﺸﺮوﻋﯿﺖ و ﻣﻘﺒﻮﻟﯿﺖ رﻫﺒﺮ ﺣﮑﻮﻣﺖ اﺳﻼﻣﯽ از ﻧﻈـﺮ ﻣﻼﺻـﺪرا و اﻣـﺎم ﺧﻤﯿﻨﯽ ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻠﯽ اﺳﺖ. ﯾﺎﻓﺘﻪﻫﺎی ﺗﺤﻘﯿﻖ ﺣﺎﮐﯽ اﺳﺖ ﮐﻪ از ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻼﺻﺪرا و اﻣـﺎم ﺧﻤﯿﻨﯽ ره( در ﻋﺼﺮ رﺳﺎﻟﺖ، ﭘﯿﺎﻣﺒﺮ) ص( ودر ﻋﺼﺮ اﻣﺎﻣﺖ، اﻣﺎم ﻣﻌﺼﻮم و درﻋﺼﺮ ﻏﯿﺒﺖ، ﺣﮑـﯿﻢ اﻟﻬـﯽ و ﻣﺠﺘﻬﺪ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ اﻟﺸﺮاﯾﻂ در راس ﻧﻈﺎم ﺳﯿﺎﺳﯽ ﻗﺮار دارد. از ﻣﺤﺘﻮای اﻧﺪﯾﺸﻪ ﺳﯿﺎﺳﯽ آنﻫﺎ، ﻧﻈﺮﯾـﻪ اﻧﺘﺼـﺎﺑﯽ ﺑﻮدن رﻫﺒﺮی در ﻋﺼﺮ ﻏﯿﺒﺖ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ اﺳﺘﺨﺮاج اﺳﺖ. اﻟﺒﺘﻪ اﻧﺘﺼﺎﺑﯽ ﺑﻮدن رﻫﺒﺮی ﺑـﻪ ﻣﻌﻨـﺎی ﻧﺎدﯾـﺪه ﮔـﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻣﺮدم ﻧﯿﺴﺖ، ﺑﻠﮑﻪ اﻧﺘﺼﺎب اﻟﻬﯽ در ﻣﻘﺎم ﺛﺒﻮت و ﻧﻘﺶ ﻣﺮدم در ﻣﻘﺎم اﺛﺒﺎت ﺣﺎﺋﺰ اﻫﻤﯿﺖ اﺳﺖ. اﮔـﺮ ﯾـﺎری ﻣﺮدم ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ رﻫﺒﺮ اﻟﻬﯽ در ﻋﺮﺻﻪ رﻫﺒﺮی ﻧﻤﯽﺗﻮاﻧﺪ اﻋﻤﺎل ﻗﺪرت ﮐﻨﺪ. ﺑﺎ اﯾﻦ وﺟﻮد ﻧﻈﺎم ﺳﯿﺎﺳﯽ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﯽ ﺑﺮ ﺣﮑﻤﺖ ﺳﯿﺎﺳﯽ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﻟﯿﻪ و در اﻧﺪﯾﺸﻪ ﺳﯿﺎﺳﯽ اﻣﺎم ﺧﻤﯿﻨﯽ ره( ﮐﻪ ﺧﻮد ﻣﺘﺎﺛﺮ از ﺣﮑﻤﺖ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﻟﯿﻪ اﺳـﺖ ﺗـﺎ زﻣﺎﻧﯽ از ﻣﺸﺮوﻋﯿﺖ ﺑﺮﺧﻮردار اﺳﺖ ﮐﻪ ﺑﺮاﺳﺎس ﻗﺎﻧﻮن اﻟﻬﯽ ﻗﺪم ﺑﺮ دارد.
This paper seeks to explore the concept of legitimacy and acceptability spearhead of Mulla Sadra and Imam Khomeini descriptive – analytical method. The results indicate that from Mulla Sadra and Imam Khomeini (RA) view point at the age of mission، the Prophet، in the era of Imam، Imam، in occultation، theologian and priest are at the head of the Islamic government and at the top of the
political system. From the content of their political ideas، theory of appointment of leadership in occultation is derived. The appointment of a leader does not mean ignoring people، but it is considered as evidence of divine appointment and its role proves important. If there were not the help of people the divine leadership cannot exercise power، it is not considered as leadership. The political system is based on political wisdom of the transcendent and the political thought of Imam Khomeini (RA) which affects the legitimacy of Transcendental Wisdom and it is legitimate
until it is based on divine law.