چکیده:
Although Motahari is not a political thinker but analyzing his political ideas and believes amongst the ideas of Iranian political thinkers in the last 5 decades is indeed essential because Motahari’s political standpoint has a key role in Islamic revolution of Iran. This paper regards Motahari's vision to his time and studies his writings according to the questions he faced and posed in his time. The first class of questions was mainly set around his opposition with Marxism and Marxism-centrism of his age with few references to the rejection of science-centrism. The second class included the "decadence of the Muslims" and Motahari's views about that. This paper ends with a focus on reason-based vs. discourse-based and theological vs. philosophical methods and their relevance to Motahari's self-raised method for answering the above-mentioned issues.
خلاصه ماشینی:
"2 Because in this paper Motahari’s name gets repeated frequently therefore the names of his books are usually used for referring to him 3 According to what was mentioned, one cannot extract a well-shaped political theory from Motahari’s writings (which can explain issues like power and government in the time of the absence of Imam Mahdi- PBUH) However, lack of independent political thoughts, should not make us think that Motahari has no role in the history of political thoughts of Iran in the recent 50 years, in contrary, while investigating the political thoughts of this era, we cannot neglect the role of this man whom Abdolkarim Soroush has called "reviver of religion and religious intellectual" (Soroush, 1370, A: 359-366; 1370, B, 40-42 and 1374: 193) and there are others4 who have called him "Ideologue of Islamic Republic" (Ghadrdan Gharamaleki, 1379; 16 and 108) or "the introducer of its thought and policy" (Supervisory committee for publishing Shahid Motahari’s works; in the collection of works or as it is pronounced in Persian: Majmu-e Aasaar, Volume 1, 1374: 27)."