چکیده:
The purpose of this paper is to apply Ibn-Khaldun’s dialectic of Asabiyya to explain
the nature of relationship between war and the world order in the modern era via
‘macro-structural change’. It is argued here that these changes in the world order in
the modern times have a dialectical relationship with war. Here, Ibn-Khaldun’s
approach to historical change is applied for the explication of this relationship. Ibn-
Khaldun’s well-known historiogarphic enterprise does provide us with an analytical
framework of how wars have been interrelated with the distribution of power and
change in that distribution. This paper attempts to show the historical significance of
war for the formation and the disintegration of world order since the 16th century.
هدف این مقاله بکار گیری "دیالکتیک عصبیت" ابن خلدون برای تبیین سرشت رابطه جنگ با نظام جهانی در عصر مدرن با ابتناء به مشاهدات "تغییرات کلان-ساختار تاریخی" است. بحث اصلی این مقاله این است که تغییرات کلان، مشخصا تغییر در "نظم جهانی"، رابطه ای دیالکتیکی با جنگ داشته است. تاریخ نگاری شاخص ابن خلدون امکان تحلیل چگونگی رابطه جنگ با توزیع قدرت و تغییر در این توزیع قدرت در سطح جهانی را در اختیار می گذارد. "علم عمران" وی ظرفیت تبیینی بالائی برای توضیح نسبت جنگ با نظم جهانی دارد. در این مقاله تلاش شده است که با استفاده از این نظریه، اهمیت تاریخی و ساختاری جنگ برای شکل گیری و از پاشیدن نظامهای جهانی از قرن شانزده میلادی به این سو در چارچوب مفهومی که در علم عمران ابن خلدون نهفته است، نشان داده شود.
خلاصه ماشینی:
"(Gilory in Barwaki:162) The most explicit consequence of omipresence of war and the colonial expansion in modern European history has been the formation of a new world order consisted of a "center" (Europe) and a "prephery" (Americas and Africa).
. among recent historians, especially in Great Britain and America, a tendency has arisen to belittle the importance of war as a contributing force in the building up of modern nations (yet) for good or for evil, militarism became one of the constituent elements of European civilization at the very time when European influence was being extended over the rest of the world.
The absence of major power conflicts, the emergence of the third world revolutions, and the dominance of the multinational corporations were all related to each other and directly linked to the 19th century - early 20th century colonialism, rivalry, and wars.
The periphery, while becoming geographically separated from the centre via independence movement, had become structurally integrated into the new world system dominated by multinational corporations-due to socioeconomic structures established in these countries by colonial powers.
Invoking his theory of social change helps to explain the role of war in the formation and disintegration of the world order over the past four centuries.
However, in the capitalist mode of production, which came about after the Industrial Revolution (as a result of the transfer of Latin American precious metal), the expansion on the world scale raised new opportunities for contestants to expand their interests; therefore, we observe more "imperial wars" in this period."