چکیده:
Aim: This research aimed to compare the efficiency of elite teachers with common teachers in
high schools of Tabriz. Methods: This research was a causal and comparative study and the data
were collected by questionnaire. The research sample consisted of 140 high schools teachers in five
areas of Tabriz. Seventy elite teachers and 70 common teachers were selected. For analysis of the
research questions Mann–Whitney U‑test was used because the data distribution was not normal.
Result: results showed that there is no significant difference in achievement of the students of the
elite teachers and achievement of the students of the common teachers. Furthermore, there is no
significant difference between teaching efficiency of the elite teachers and teaching efficiency of the
common teachers. However, there is a significant difference between the efficiency of assessment
of the elite teachers and the common teachers. Conclusions: The efficiency of assessment of the
elite teachers is better than the common teachers. The success of any organization in achieving of
the goals depends on the efficiency and efficacy of the teachers.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Ravanshad[7] and Abdullahzadeh[8] concluded that the selected teachers are interested in their jobs and pay more attention to the students’ personal differences; they are aware of the latest theories of teaching and learning psychology and methods.
In a qualitative research in one of the educational area in Australia Duarte[15] concluded that the elite teachers have teaching skills and they are disciplined and organize the students, assess learning, have meaningful feedback and let the students to challenge on the subjects, respond to the students’ needs, supervise the students and interact actively.
The following questions were investigated: (1) Is there any difference in academic achievement of the students of the elite teachers with the students of common teachers?
So, it is concluded that there is no difference in teaching efficiency of the elite teachers with the students of common teachers.
Mann–Whitney U‑test results showed that there is no difference in academic achievement of the students of the elite teachers with the students of common teachers and this finding is consistent to the findings of[3,6,7,12‑15,19] that they did not report any relationship.
Mann– Whitney U‑test results showed that there is no difference in teaching efficiency of the elite teachers with the students of common teachers.
Mann–Whitney U‑test depicts that there is a difference in efficiency of the interaction with students of the elite teachers with the students of common teachers.
This finding is consistent to the finding of UNESCO, Salehi and Shabani[11,12,21] that depicts the elite teachers interact differently with the students.