چکیده:
The paper discusses insincerity, as well as the types and methods of its manifestation. Details reflect the characteristics of a lying person and his manner of behavior in an insincere atmosphere. The paper is aimed at explaining the linguistic mechanisms underlying the expression of insincerity, and developing a general theoretical understanding of the role of insincerity in verbal communication. Insincerity is understood as a discursive strategy of a linguistic personality, aimed at the intentional expression of false propositions and their corresponding linguistic design. The research discusses a set of types associated with the separate consideration of falsity as properties of propositions, that is, such knowledge of some possible world, which contradicts the objective picture of the world, and insincerity as a characteristic of the speaking subject related to its communicative intentions and features of the communication situation. The linguistic representation of insincerity is revealed.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Agaeva 1 Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia 2 University of Oran, Oran, Algeria 681 250 I Special Issue of Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 10, Summer & Autumn 2019 (2017) also indicates the active role of the speaker in the creation of truth values in the process of communication.
Arkhipova, Andrievskii, Shalamova and Sidorova (2018) describe peculiar features of verbalization of emotions in the texts of the English and Russian online mass media covering economic and financial spheres giving statistical data obtained from the comparative analysis of the lexis representing emotions in the English and Russian articles (Smakhtin et al.
Fallowing Povamin ( 1988), we can identify the following most characteristic signs of insincerity, including excitement, manifested in voice and speech when transmitting false information: involuntary change of intonation; change of speech rate; change of voice timbre; the appearance of a tremor in the voice; the appearance of pauses when answering questions that should not have caused difficulties; too fast answers to questions that should make you think; the appearance of expressions in speech atypical for a given person in normal communication or the disappearance of words and phrases typical for him; demonstrative underlining with the help of speech means intonation, pauses, etc.
In other words, it is much easier to hide the truth or true attitude towards a person through words, facial expressions, voices, and more difficult with the help of other means of communication (gestures, movements, posture).