خلاصه ماشینی:
The structure of the entropic argument is similar to the topologists’ creation argument, although its first proof is in the theistic M ulla Sadra, on the basis of the principality of existence, the unity of the dubiety and the substantial movement and Ibn Arabi, on the basis of the unity of existence, believe in congregation in the meaning of the distinct manifestation of interiors of creatures such as plant, animal, and human in the resurrection and after death on the vast earth that deserves the manifestation of divine light and the angels and prophets’ intuition that they bring together all creatures and creatures in different groups.
Identity of Subject and Objectin the View of Ibn Sina and Sadr-ol-Mote'allehin ( Jalil Muhammadi Khanghah (PhD student of Islamic Philosophy & Theology) ( Abdullah Nasri (Professor at Allameh Tabataba'i University) T he “identity of subject and object” is one of the few issues that has been met with the disagreement of two great philosophers.
The most important philosophical foundations of this theory in Sadr-ol-Mote'allehin wisdom are: the theory of apprehender-to-apprehended unity, the theory of substantial movement, and the way of being particular existence of the human soul rational in Mulla Sadra.
The Essence or Existential Challenge of the Will of God from Imam Reza’s Viewpoint according to Mulla Sadra’s Philosophical Interpretationwith Criticism of Allameh Tabataba'i’s Theory ( Asmaa Ahmadi (PhD student of Comparative Philosophy at University of Qom) ( Mahmoud Saidi (Assistant professor at Shahed University) O ne of the most important issues in the Shi'ite theological foundations is divine attributes which is mentioned in various them.