چکیده:
ﯾﮑﯽ از ﻋﺮﺻــﻪﻫﺎﯾﯽ ﮐﻪ ﻣﺠﺘﻬﺪ ﺷﺒﺴﺘﺮی ﺑﻪ آن ورود ﮐﺮده، ﺑﺤﺚ ذاﺗﯽ و ﻋﺮﺿﯽ ﯾﺎ ﮔﻮﻫﺮ و ﺻــﺪف دﯾﻦ اﺳــﺖ. وی دراﯾﻦﺑﺎره دو ﻧﻈﺮ دارد: در ﻣﻮردی ﮔﻮﻫﺮ دﯾﻦ را ﺗﺠﺮﺑــﻪ دﯾﻨﯽ ﻣﯽداﻧــﺪ و در ﻣﻮرد دﯾﮕﺮ ﮔﻮﻫﺮ دﯾﻦ را ﻣﻘﺼـــﻮد ﺑــﺎﻟــﺬات ﻣﻌﺮﻓﯽ ﻣﯽﮐﻨﺪ. اﯾﻦ دو دﯾﺪﮔﺎه را ﻣﯽﺗﻮان ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮرت ﺟﺪا ارزﯾﺎﺑﯽ ﮐﺮد؛ اﻣﺎ ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﯽرﺳﺪ ﻣﺮاد وی از ﻃﺮح ﺑﺤﺚ ﻣﻘﺎﺻــﺪ ﺑﺎﻟﺬات ﯾﺎﻓﺘﻦ وﺟﻪ اﺷﺘﺮاﮐﯽ ﻣﯿﺎن ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪﻫﺎی دﯾﻨﯽ ﺑﻪﻃﻮرﮐﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﺘﻤﺎﯾﺰ از ﯾﮑﺪﯾﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎظ ﻣﺎﻫﻮی اﺳـــﺖ. وﺟﻪ اﺷـــﺘﺮاک ﭘﯿﺶﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪﻫﺎی دﯾﻨﯽ را ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎظ ﻣﻘﺎﺻﺪ ﺑﺎ ﯾﮑﺪﯾﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ اﺷﺘﺮاک ﻣﯽرﺳﺎﻧﺪ. ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﭘﯿﺶ رو ﻗﺼﺪ دارد دو دﯾﺪﮔﺎه ﻃﺮحﺷﺪه را ﻣﻮرد ﻣﺪاﻗﻪ ﻗﺮار داده، اوﻟﺎ راﺑﻄﻪ اﯾﻦ دو دﯾﺪﮔﺎه را ﺑﺮرﺳــﯽ ﮐﻨﺪ؛ ﺛﺎﻧﯿﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮرﺳــﯽ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﮐﺸﻒ ذاﺗﯿﺎت دﯾﻦ آنﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﮐﻪ در ﻧﻈﺮ وی ﻣﻄﺮح ﺷــﺪه اﺳــﺖ، ﺑﭙﺮدازد. ﻫﻤﭽﻨﯿﻦ روش ﺑﻪ ﮐﺎر ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺷــﺪه در اﯾﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﯾﻪ را اﻋﺘﺒﺎرﺳﻨﺠﯽ ﮐﻨﺪ.
One of the areas that Mojtahed Shabestari has entered, is the argument of essential and accidential of religion or the gem and shell. He looks at this two: Once, he knows the gem of religion as religious experience and in other cases, represents the gem of religion as the by-itself purpose. These two views can be evaluated separately, but it seems, his goal to discuss the by-itself purpose is finding common aspect between the religious experiences that completely different from one another in essentiality. The contribution of the foregoing share the religious experiences with each other, for the sake of purpose. This paper aims to examine the two proposed views: First, examine the relationship between these two views, secondly, the logic of the discovery of the essences of religion analyze, as it has been posited in his opinion. It also validates the method used in this theory.