چکیده:
تروریسم به عنوان جرمی بین المللی هنوز تعریف نشده است و در گذشته نگاه
دول تمحور در ارتکاب آن حاکم بوده ولی با گسترش این جرم و فراملی شدن آن و
استقلال بیشتر تروریست ها از دول تها، جامعه بین المللی در پی آن است که در
چهارچوب حقوق بین الملل کیفری با این پدیده مبارزه نماید. گروهی معتقدند
عدم تعریف تروریسم منجر به آن شده است که حقوق بی نالملل کیفری در مبارزه با
این پدیده عاجز بماند. درمقابل این نظر وجود دارد که حقوق بی نالملل کیفری در
قالب کنوانسیون های شانزد هگانه مبارزه با تروریسم و اساسنامه دیوان بین الملل
کیفری تا حدود زیادی به مبارزه با تروریسم پرداخته است اما واقع امر آن است که
این جرم انگاری ها محدود بوده و را هحلی جامع برای مبارزه ریشه ای با تروریسم ارائه
نم یدهند. این مقاله در پی بررسی این واقعیت است.
Terrorism as an international crime does not have been defined yet and states supported perspective dominated on it in the past. But with expansion of terrorism, getting transnational aspect and more independence from states, international community seeks to fight against this phenomenon in the context of international criminal law. Some writers believe international community is somewhat unable to fight against it because of the lack of terrorism definition. Even though, there is this idea that international criminal law largely has fought against terror in the context of sixteen conventions against terrorism and statute of international criminal court. But, actually, these criminalization are limited and there is no comprehensive solution for solving terrorism problem basically. This article pursues to consider this reality.
خلاصه ماشینی:
5. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 17 July 1998, UNDoc, A/CONF/.
Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its 48th Session, UN GAOR 51st session 6, May-26 July 1996, Supplement No. 10 (A/51/10), Draft Code of Crimes against the Peace and Security of Mankind (1996 Draft Code), Commentary to art.
htm; ICT Statute, UN Doc. S/RES/827 (1993) of 25 May 1993; ICTR Statute, “UN Doc S/RES/955 (1994), Statute of Special Court, annexed to Agreement between the UN and Government of Sierra Leone on the Establishment of Special Court for Sierra Leone of 16 January 2002,” Accessed 2017, http://www.
Jones, The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), 240.
M. Cherif Bassiouni, International Criminal Law (Leiden: Transnational Publisher, 1999), 98-99.
Helen Duffy, The “War on Terror” and the Framework of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 75.
Arthur Watts, The International Law Commission 1948-1998 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), 1657.
Cassese, Gaeta and Jones, The Rome Statute of International Criminal Court, op.
Jean-Marie Henckaerts and Louise Doswald-Beck, Customary International Humanitarian Law (Cambridge: ICRC and Cambridge University Press, 2005): 551-555.
International Criminal Law. Leiden: Transnational Publisher, 1999.
Commentaries on the International Law Commission’s 1991 Draft Code of Crimes against Peace and Security of Mankind.
Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its 48th Session, UN GAOR 51st session 6, May-26 July 1996, Supplement No. 10 (A/51/10), Draft Code of Crimes against the Peace and Security of Mankind (1996 Draft Code).