چکیده:
The aim of this study is to describe the development and content validation of a magic performance
evaluation checklist. Content validation process consisted of two stages. Stage 1 was item
generation and stage 2 was item evaluation where 16 professional magicians evaluated items
generated from stage 1 for relevance. In Stage 2, each magician independently rated the relevance of each item in the checklist. A content validity index was used to determine the percentage of agreement among the ratings. Stage 1 resulted in a 5-item checklist which included essential skills needed to perform magic. Each item was rated on a three-point scale. The scale content validity index of the checklist was 0.99, which was well above the set criterion of 0.8. Content of the magic performance evaluation checklist was considered relevant to evaluate the ability of rehabilitation therapists to demonstrate magic tricks which provides a benchmark of competency for them to teach magic tricks to children.
خلاصه ماشینی:
org International Journal of Applied Arts Studies IJAPAS 3(4) (2018) 77–82 Content Validation of a Checklist to Evaluate Therapists' Competency in Delivering Magic Tricks Kevin Spencera, Hon K.
Yuenb* aMA, Professional Magician, Lynchburg, VA bProfessor & Director of Research, Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA Received 28 August 2018; revised 20 Jauary 2019; accepted 30 June 2019 Abstract The aim of this study is to describe the development and content validation of a magic performance evaluation checklist.
Study Design The study used a cross-sectional survey research design to establish the content validity of a performance checklist to evaluate rehabilitation therapists’ competency in delivering magic tricks.
Procedures The purpose of this stage was to assess the relevance of each of the five items on the newly created performance checklist to evaluate rehabilitation therapists’ competency in delivering magic tricks.
Table 1 Item evaluation of the magic performance evaluation checklist by professional magician participants (n=16) (VIEW the Image this page) CVI = Content Validity Index 5.
e. , magicians) used to establish content validity for the magic performance evaluation checklist exceeded the 10 recommended in the literature (Lynn, 1986).
One limitation of the study was that the process of content validation did not include a pilot testing stage in which professional magicians observe rehabilitation therapists deliver the magic tricks and evaluate their competency.
6. Conclusion This study used professional magicians’ input and review to establish the content validity of the magic performance checklist for evaluating the rehabilitation therapists’ competency in delivering magic tricks.