چکیده:
Jean-Paul Sartre's point of view on the originality of existence philosophy is interleaved with concepts such as: freedom, apprehension, choice, awareness and human presence as well as everything that leading to man's liberation is reflected in his plays. Jean-Paul Sartre puts existence precede to the nature and considered the man as a potential free being that in the way of freedom he is responsible not only for himself but also for others. In the book of "Existence and Non- Existence" he is believes in deconstruction in all social and cultural fields. Sartre sees drama as a window for attitudinize the universe. The concept of existentialism in his plays is under the influence of philosophical and ideological propositions. Moral and political characteristics in the works of Jean-Paul Sartre expressed in such a way that describes a kind of worldview with philosophical propositions and dramatic, artful technique.
Therefore, one of the questions in this article is how did Sartre's dramatic literature benefit from the philosophy of existentialism?
How does existence and non-existence appear in most of Sartre's plays? What does the concept of hell basically mean in his works? In this article, an attempt has been made to demonstrate how existence and non-existence and the critique of dialectical wisdom have been evaluated in his plays.
خلاصه ماشینی:
International Journal of Applied Arts Studies IJAPAS 5(4) (2020) 41–54 The Impression of the Originality of Existence Philosophy Concepts in the Dramatic Literature with Emphasis on Three Plays (Nausea, Dirty Hands and the Satan and God) Hamid Kakasoltania*, Pedram Dadfarb aPh. D.
Student, Department of Photography, Faculty Member of Arts, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran Received 09 February 2021; revised 05 March 2021; accepted 15 March 2021 Abstract Jean-Paul Sartre's point of view on the originality of existence philosophy is interleaved with concepts such as: freedom, apprehension, choice, awareness and human presence as well as everything that leading to man's liberation is reflected in his plays.
Jean-Paul Sartre puts existence precede to the nature and considered the man as a potential free being that in the way of freedom he is responsible not only for himself but also for others.
Evidence shows that Sartre, Nietzsche, Kafka, Sadegh Hedayat, and according to many western philosophy reporters, Albert Camus, UNESCO, Arrabal, and even Harold Pinter, under the influence of the existentialism school, created works in the field of dramatic literature and it seems that they made an attempt to portray the existence and freedom of human.
Based on this view, each human is the God of his universe and in fact, he is not man, but God. Based on this kind of attitude towards man in Sartre's philosophy, can his thoughts on morality be justified?