چکیده:
قاعده«کل حرام مضطر الیه، فهوحال» از عناوین ثانویه و ازجمله قواعدی که در استنباط و اجتهاد احکام فقهی نقش بسزایی دارد. این قاعده که با نام قاعده اضطرار شهرت یافته از قواعد کاربردی و اساسی فقه بوده و به ویژه درحل مشکات و معضات مباحث و مسائل نو پیدا نقش اساسی دارد. اگرچه فقها از این قاعده باعنوان یاد شده کمتر بحث ک ردهاند ولی استحکام و ادله فراوان آن از یک سو و نقش کاربردی آن در سرتاسر فقه ازسوی دیگر حائز اهمیت است .
The principle of «Necessities permitted forbidden» is one of the secondary titles and one
of the principles that has a great role in discovery of Jurisprudential sentences. This principle
is known as the principle of necessity and consider as the basic and applicable principle of
jurisprudence also it’s effect and performance can be seen everywhere in jurisprudence.
Particularly in solving the problems and troubles of new topics and issues, it plays an essential
role. Although Jurists have less talked about it; But strength and Plenty of evidence about it from
a side and it’s applicable role in everywhere of jurisprudence from another side has made us to
think a little about it. However independent and coherent considers of this principle by Imamia›s
jurists and specify the limits and criteria for using it caused that we write current article With
the aim of introducing the concepts of this principle and conditions and causes of necessity,
authority or necessity requirement, being personal or special necessity and introducing some of
jurisprudential aspects based on the principle of necessity.