خلاصه ماشینی:
The hypothesis of this essay is that the failure of Israel to meet its goals in the 33-day war diminished the level of national security of this regime in terms of military, socio-political and economic dimensions.
The strategy aimed to contain Israel's overwhelming military advantages while maximizing the ©Institute for Political and International Studies LEBANON'S ASYMMETRIC WARFARE 7 limited power of Hezbollah.
s Israel's war tactics were greatly influenced by American operations in Kosovo and Iraq, that is, to carry out numerous ©Institute for Political and International Studies LEBANON'S ASYMMETRIC WARFARE 9 bombing missions against presumed Hezbollah's military bases, civilian, and media targets.
Israel's failure to tackle these asymmetric threats through employment of common and conventional strategies, methods and means backs to the ©Institute for Political and International Studies 16 THE IRANIAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS asymmetric nature of these threats in such a ,,vay that the national security's theory and doctrines of this regime are now under serious questions.
The military outcome It should be said that the Lebanon 33-day war through subjective and objective threats at internal and external levels affected Israel's national security.
Israel's primary ©lnstitllte for Political and International Studies LEBANON'S ASYMMETRIC WARFARE 17 military objective was to degrade Hezbollah's ability to launch crossborder air and ground attacks.
The foremost consequent of the 33-day war for Israel is the reconstruction of its military power and reviewing its national security strategy to counter asymmetric threats and guerrilla warfare.