چکیده:
در این مقاله رابطه بین سرماه اجتماعی و امنیت مورد بررسی قرار گرفته و سوالاتی نظیر آیا اصلاحات نهایی باعث ارتقاء امنیت اجتماعی و توسعه حکمرانی مطلوب می شود؟ مطرح می شود. بنابر فرضیه اصلی تحقیق که بررسی رابطه بین اعتماد اجتماعی و امنیت اجتماعی است، فرضیه فرعی ارتباط بین سرماه اجتماعی و اعتماد اجتماعی نیز مورد بررسی قرار می گیرد. این فرضیات مبتنی بر چارچوب نظری هستند که این چارچوب معتقد است امنیت اجتماعی مفهومی است که در متن نظام اجتماعی باز تولید و شکل می گیرد و اگر ابزارهای برقراری امنیت را دو سطح «قهر آمیز» و «انگیزش»در نظر بگیریم، در این صورت سطح قهر آمیز در نظام سیاسی و سطح انگزشی در نظام اجتماعی است و بدین ترتیب با ایجاد امنیت در سطح نظام اجتماعی، ضمن کاهش هزینه های برقراری امنیت توسط دولتف کارایی و مشروعیت نظام سیاسی هم افزایش می یابد.
از این لحاظ جامعه ای که متکی به قوه قهریه برای حفظ نظم اجتماعی است، فاقد اعتماد و ناکارآمد تحقق آزادی های مدنی است و هرچه نظم اجتماعی بر پایه سرمایه اجتماعی باشد، به همان میزان نیز امنیت اجتماعی افزایش خواهد یافت
In this paper, the authors are trying to survey the relationship between social
capital and social security and to answer to questions such as how final reforms
will promote social security and desirable develpement of rule?
According to main hypothesis of research which is trying to survey the relationship
between social confidence and social security, the sub-hy pothesis is
trying to survey the relationship between social capital and social confidence.
These hypotheses are according to theoretical framework and believe that social
security is a meaning which will reproduct in social system and if we consider
tools of security establishment in two levels of in exorable and motivation
therefore, there is inexorable level in political system and motivation level in
social system and by creating security in level of social system and goveament
by decreasing costs of security creation will increase legitimation of political
system. Therefore a society which is rely on police force for protecting of social
order it is unsuitable for creation of civil freedoms and if social order to be
based on social capital, social security would be increased.
social expectations. One of his major characteristics is being self-governing,
and not feeling sinful. The individuals belonging to this age group might get
involved in drug abuse, untruthfulness, running away from home and school.
The consequences of such behaviors are nothing just jeopardizing the society
and depriving people from security. It seems that these behaviors indicate that
the existing cultural system is not able to provide their needs; therefore, the
group has initiated a new culture, which opposes the existing culture. Social
science experts have dealt with the issue from two viewpoints:
1) Pathology viewpoint,
2) cultural viewpoint. The present research has inserted its present hypotheses
in the second viewpoint. Majority of astray have a common culture, have
similarities in terms of individual, economic and social characteristics. In line
with this, efforts were made to examine the impacts of subcultures on felon
teenagers.
A sample of 100 persons including a group of 50 (trial group) and another
group of 50 (control group) were chosen among the male felons of between 14-
18 in the correction centre (trial group) and 50 other persons (control group)
from among guidance schools were chosen and reviewed through interview,
observation and using a questionnaire. The result of the research indicate that
the research hypotheses prove that the teenagers are looking for acquiring
identity, and are more vulnerable than other members of the society. The appearance;
economic, social and cultural status, place where they live, parents’
income and teachers’ attitude at schools contribute to the issue; in addition,
there are many similarities between them. At the end, there is a significant difference
between the two groups through using variance analysis (f).