Abstract:
The article depicts the situation before Cold War in which developing countries (DCs) and least Developed countries (LDCs) found themselves big loser, as they were deprived from participation in trade negotiation process, leading into establishment of GATT . Therefore, they resorted to UNCTAD as the sole defender of their interests against Developed Countries in trade negotiations. UNCTAD has encountered with some serious challenges since its establishment in 1964.The climax of the challenges were in 1995when WTO was established and coincided with UN reform as well as in-dustrial world opposition to UNCTAD position against them. Finally, the challenges made UNCTAD transform its ideology from confronting with globalization and trade liberalization to partnership for development through capacity building for DCs and LDCs to take more benefit from new international trade negotiations which globalization had imposed. The challenges also compelled UNCTAD to with-draw from its preliminary idealistic ideology of creation of new international economic order. The im-plication of the challenges also changed UNCTAD from an organization, issuing powerful resolutions against developed countries into a body implementing capacity-building activity especially for the non-member developing and least developed countries of WTO for accession to the organization. This arti-cle will answer the main question whether UNCTAD could keep up its preliminary ideology on inter-national trade or faced with serious challenges made it change its ideology and intergovernmental ma-chinery. In addition, it will shed light on the challenges imposed on its three pillars namely technical assistance, independent research and analysis as well as consensus building.
Machine summary:
The report emphasized that all efforts to strengthen international organizations in the area of multilateral trade should be adapted to modern realities and avoid the inadequacies of the existing institutional structures by ad- dressing issues such as (a) setting objectives by the international community with respect to international trade and development within a framework de- signed to facilitate consideration of interre- lated issues including trade, finance, invest- ment, technology, anti-competitive practices, information, services, access to networks and distribution as well as labour migration; (b) ensuring maximum transparency and full par- ticipation of all countries in international de- cision-making, and contributing to greater coherence in global economic policy-making through the formulation of broad guidelines and effective coordination among relevant international organizations; (c) providing a source of intellectual support and a forum for international consensus building; (d) provid- ing an improved mechanism for the admin- istration of contractual multilateral trade agreements, particularly in new areas such as services and intellectual property rights along with future agreements which may be negoti- ated (competition, investment, TNCs, tech- nology, etc.
For the Second WTO Ministerial Confer- ence the UNCTAD secretariat had prepared a discussion paper for the Group of 77 enti- tled Building a Positive Agenda for Devel- oping Countries in View of Future Multilat- eral Trade Negotiations: The Scope and Timing of Future Multilateral Trade Negoti- ations which examined the issues involved in the “built-in agenda” in the WTO Agree- ments and the “New Issues” which had been proposed for inclusion in Future multilateral rounds (http://www.