Abstract:
The main purpose of this paper is to recognize the existing world-view in Masoud Kimiaei`s Films by using critical discourse analysis during five decades and to compare it with trans-formational concept in life-world and communicative action theories. This critical discourse analysis is based on Norman Ferklaf, the information basis is based on one film from each decade; that is the films are chosen from Gheisar in 1340 to trial in Street in 1380. So, “Gheisar”, “Gavazanha”,”Snake`s Tooth”, “Mercedes” and “Trial in the Street” are films which are analyzed. The findings show that the discourse of Kimiaei`s films during this five decades mainly contain sexism( superiority of men) in the social rank and un-equality between these two sexes in communications and arguments; and in other hand, there are pre-modern ideas in dealing with crisis such as punishment that are emphasized and the kinds of interpersonal communication mainly are based on interaction between done traditions and not apart from them and these are not seriously the reviewer the tradition, therefore the concepts which should be accepted in socialibility of the people, can't be seen in these films, which can be seen in the rational society based on rationalized life-world , and other thing is that there is not a great change in discourse of his works, during these five decades.
Machine summary:
"The questions about the quality of the social and cultural rank of the woman and man in these films based on quality concept in them and also, co-operation concept of them in communication phenomena is equal it should be noted that the method and the quality of dealing the characters with crisis and their causes related to mildness and lawfulness and the usage of violence in them are studied by words, expression, dialogues and signs that were used in the most of the discourse of his works; and on the other hand, interpersonal communication according to existence or non-existence of mentioned indexes in ideal communicative action in Habermas`s points of view are analyzed as usage of critical intellectualism in it.
Speech Action The sentence "then, that poor child has been got un-chastity", chastity value according to narration, contains a special meaning in the social relations because after her death, the family doers argue about the quality of conflict with the guilty one.
The sentence by Amir " I will go to that man, I will bring out his hands out of his body and if wants to lie, I don't let him" has both experiential and communicational value, because the existing knowledge in that context is right that a citizen and the social relations have such a right."