Abstract:
Objective: The studies since the second half of the 20th century have revealed the effect of stress on the heart and vessels with mediating neurological indicators and techniques of dysfunctional coping techniques. They also have shown that stress management and the improvement of coping techniques improve the indicators. The present study examined the appraisal of the effect of coping-therapy on cortisol, Interleukin 6 (IL-6) and Interleukin 1β (IL-1β) in comparison with the control group. Method: The study was a quasi-experimental research with pre-test andpost-test design conducted on 44 patients (randomly assigned into two experimental and control groups) suffering from coronary heart disease who were hospitalized in ShahidRajaei Heart Hospital in Tehran. The experimental group was treated with coping-therapy, and the immunological indicators of both groups were measured using ELISA at the beginning, the fourth,the eighth, (immediately after the end of treatment), the tenth, and the fourteenth weeks. The collected data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA by SPSS. The gender and education of the sample was controlled statistically. Results: The results revealed that coping-therapy could significantly decrease cortisol from 4.693 to 2.519, IL-6 from 8.315 to 4.226, IL-1β from 2.759 to 1.850 from the PreTest to the end of the fourteenth week (follow-up). Conclusion: Considering the cognitive limitations of the present study, one can conclude that coping-therapy may decrease the negative effects of stress on immunological indicators through improving dysfunctional techniques to effective ones, and in this way, reveal the positive effects on health.
Machine summary:
Interleukin 1b To test the effect of coping-therapy on the Interleukin 1β level of patients’ blood plasma in comparison with the control group, first the assumptions of repeated measures ANOVA were examined and then the test was run.
. results of repeated measures ANOVA (Interleukin 1β) [%%ابتدای جدول%%Interleukin 1b, Groups: Mean (SD), Time effect, Time*group, Time*sex effect, Time*education, In Time (weeks), , , , effect, , effect, , Control, Coping-, , , , , , , , F(p value), F(p value), F(p value), F(p value), , , therapy, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 0.
Results of repeated measures ANOVA (Table 3) reveals that the effect of time that states within group changes across time from the pre-test to the follow-up session is not significant (p=.
It might be stated that although some studies revealed the effect of stress on health through biomarkers including cortisol, interleukin 6, and also interleukin 1β (Atkinson RL, 2000; Brammer LM, 1993; Glozier N, 2013; Lakhan, 2006; Qureshi GM, 2009; Rohleder N, 2006; Rozanski A, 1999; Saner, 2005; Schwartz AR, 2003; Segerstrom SC, 2004; H.
M. Steptoe A, 2012; Von Känel, 2006; Yamakawa K, 2009) that results in CHD(Brammer LM, 1993; Brydon L, 2005), other studies revealed the effect of using effective stress coping techniques in the decrease [%%ابتدای جدول%% , %%انتهای جدول%%] of these immunologic indicators(Bayer U, 2010; Chiou A, 1997; Damsa, 1988; Roy, 2004; Sarafino, 2002).