Abstract:
به منظور تضمین قانونمداری و التزام به هنجارهای برتر در مصوبات قوه مجریه» به موجب اصول ۸۵
و ۱۳۸ قانون اساسی رئیس مجلس شورای اسلامی از طریق هیات بررسی و تطبیق مصوبات دولت با
قوانین به نظارت میپردازد. چگونگی تغییر این مرجع نظارتی در روند بازنگری قانون اساسی و
قرارگرفتن در عرض دیوان عدالت اداری و کارکرد و نقایص آن از جمله موارد مورد بحث در این
نوشتار میباشد. با بررسی توصیفی -تحلیلی به این نتیجه رهنمون شدیم که این مرجع نظارتی در عین
وجود ثمرات گسترده در نظام حقوقی کشورمان دارای سه قسم خلا در زمینههای مبنایی، قانونی و
ساختاری است که باعث خدشهپذیری و کارکرد بحثبرانگیز آن شده است. با بررسی و نقد این
نقایص به ارائه پیشنهاداتی به مناور افزایش کارکردها و رفع موانع موجود میپردازیم.
and specifying its sanction system. One of the guarantees of the superior rule's compliance with the executive power's decisions is the parliament speaker’s supervisory authority according to Article 85 & 138 of the Constitution. The constituent parts of the legal hierarchy in our country are the holy Islam, the Constitution, the parliament rules and the governmental decisions respectively. This kind of review is non-judicial and is next to the administrative justice court and is done by a specific commission by reviewing and comparing governmental decisions with superior laws. This review has some differences from other supervision structures in bases, subjects, scope and sanctions and its absence of unity has caused criticism against its legal and logical validity. Through the general rules of the public law, we have analyzed the topic, criterions of evaluation, guarantees and the effects of this review and finally by a pathological analysis and comparison of that with the French legal system we were led to the usefulness of this kind of review of decisions of the executive power in our legal system, but about its form and quality, by noting the defects and present inefficiencies, we reached to the necessity of transforming this kind of supervisory authority from the person-centered form to the structure-based and systematic review.
Machine summary:
مرجع قضايي ديوان عدالت اداري اصلیترین مرجع حافظ جايگاه و ارزش قوانين فرادست ميباشد و در عرض آن مرجع نظارتي رئيس مجلس شوراي اسلامي به موجب اصول 85 و 138 قانون اساسي، به عنوان نهاد نظارتي غيرقضايي به منظور نيل به همين مقصود مشخص شده است که به نظارت در ضمن ابلاغ برای اجراء ميپردازد.
ir ** Master of Public Law (Corresponding Author ) Bi-quarterly Journal Govah Legal Education Vol. 4, No. 2 (Serial 7), Autumn and Winter 2018 Organized Smuggling in Goods in Iran's Criminal Law *Seyed Hosein MirMohammadSadeghi ** MohammadReza Oddoomizadeh One of the most dangerous offenses that, due to its specific characteristics, threatens the economic, social, and even political security of the society, is the organized crime that, as the advancement of science and technology on the global arena, manifests itself in new forms.
com ** Master of Criminal Law and Criminology (Corresponding Author) Bi-quarterly Journal Govah Legal Education Vol. 4, No. 2 (Serial 7), Autumn and Winter 2018 No reproduction condition of permanent wedlock in Iran and imam jurisprudence *Mohammad Roshan ** Esmail Siavashpour Not knowing permanent wedlock requirement and the following insert of some of the conditions completely, the subject to the evidence of the necessity of fulfillment to no reproduction condition of permanent wedlock.
ir ** Private law PHD candidate of Shiraz university (Corresponding Author) Bi-quarterly Journal Govah Legal Education Vol. 4, No. 2 (Serial 7), Autumn and Winter 2018 Mechanisms of Access to Information of Budget in Iran Legal System and European Union *Seyed MohammadHadi Raji ** Ahmad Salehi Free access to information is one of the most essential tools for promoting transparency and improving governance.