Abstract:
Problem Statement: Creating communication between human and his/her environment
has certainly played a vital role in human life and providing his/her material and spiritual
needs from the distant past. This interaction has been exhibited in different eras and different
landscapes and has reinforced the culture of the people of each country. Also, this interaction
of environment and landscape with the help of perception and participation plays an important
role in improving the qualitative dimensions of the landscape and it has been attempted to
enhance it through a participatory landscape.
Research objective: The current paper aims to examine the perception characteristics of
urban and participatory landscapes and to present adaptive factors of landscape perception and
participation field.
Research method: In this study, a combination of content analysis and comparative methods
has been used. First, it tries to reason about perception and participation, and then to seek ways
of applying a comparative approach in a participatory landscape. The first section of this article
focuses on theoretical discussions on perception and participation in content analysis, which
have been made possible using qualitative strategies in the context of rational reasoning, then
explores the perceptions and participation factors similarities via comparative analysis.
Conclusion: Landscape perception is depended on spatia-visual, Functional, behavioralvisual
and participation on participatory theory, multi level rangeand Participatory template and
method AND Participatory ladder. By using these definitions, Conceptual model is presented
in this article which shows the two-way relationship between landscape perception and
participation. Results show that Reciprocal outcome by personal,generalized and institutional
trust is effective in development and formation process of participatory landscape. At the end
design participatory landscape pattern Provided with the opinion of experts.
Machine summary:
42 The Scientific Journal of NAZAR research center (Nrc) for Art, Architecture & Urbanism Bagh-e Nazar, 17(90),37-58/ Dec. 2020 (View the image of this page) Factors shaping the perception of landscape Semantic-cultural characteristics Functional properties Physical features People's learning, experiences, culture and habits Collective events and memories Presence of distinct functions and biological activities Far and near landscape, artificial landscapes, bodies, spatial body, signs, indicator elements Key elements of floor and roofing, sky lines, threshold, directions, range Fig. 1.
(2018); Milioris (2019); Wang et al 2019 Functional- spatial percep- tion (functional (properties Visual-Behav- Form improve- ment, social and functional exchanges An individual's relation- ship with the environment Relph (1976); Trancik (1986); Gobster (1995); Kauffmann, Ramanoël, Guyader, Chauvin & Peyrin (2015); Kefayati & Moztarzadeh (2015); Jasińska (2016); Parysek & Mierzejewska (2016); Chen & Tao (2017); McClinchey (2017); Ishak & Haymaker (2018); Borucińska- Bieńkowska, 2019 Appleyard (1979); Lang (1987); Gehl (1987); Punter (1991); Relph (2007); Polat & Akay (2015); Wang et al.
; Davidson (1998); Sanoff (2000); Francis & Lorenzo (2002); Delli Priscoli (2003); Chagutah (2009); Hopkins (2010); Nyerges & Agu- irre (2011); Clifford (2013); Duperrin (2014); Usov (2014);) Kahila-Tani,Broberg, Kyttä & Tyger (2016); IAP2 (2017); Du et al.
Wiedemann & Femers (1993); Chambers (1996); Rowe (1998); Driskell (2002); Delli Priscoli (2003); Van Bo- chove (2008); Yang (2008); Deakin (2009); Hopkins (2010); Nadeem & Fischer (2011); Ca- may, Mosseri,Gray, Stein, Macguire, Jordan, Sanagavarapu & Leung, (2013); EU (2014); Ross et al.