بررسی و نقد اختلاف اشاعره با معتزله قدیم و جدید و امامیه در رابطه با حُسن و قبح عقلی و ثمره‌ی اصولی آن Journal Article

Corresponding Author: صادق تبریزی، امیر ؛

Writer: جلالی زاده، جلال ؛ ذوالفقار طلب، مصطفی ؛

فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی پاییز و زمستان 1400، دوره پنجاه و چهارم - شماره 2 ، Science-Research (Ministry of Science/ISC (‎12 page(s) - From 287 to 298 )

Keywords: معتزله امامیه اشاعره حسن قبح Virtue Ash‘arites Imamiyeh indecency Mu‘tazilites

fa en

Abstract:

The subject of research in this article is whether the intellect can independently recognize the virtue and indecency of deeds without the help of the Shari‘a, so that it can be assigned? The early Ash‘arites believe that the intellect needs the teachings of the prophets in knowing the rules, and that Shari‘a is the only the source of virtue and indecency. But according to the Mu‘tazilites, the first argument in understanding virtue and indecency is the intellect. According to the Imamiyeh, virtue and indecency are intellectual but intellect is not needless of the Shari‘a and the new Mu‘tazilites in the early twentieth century sought to portray Islam in harmony with the elements of modernity with a new interpretation of Qur’anic concepts. In this article, it is attempted to explain that firstly, the intellect does not need the Shari‘a in determining the virtue and indecency of deeds. Secondly, in case of contradiction, the legislator’s designation is prior to intellect.

Download citation file :
(پژوهیار, , , )

Download PDF
Downlaod HTML

Shortlink:

Page: