The idea of meeting the intent and error in the Penal Code is the idea of sticking.
And there are a lot of opinions that appeared in question to the fact that meeting
the intent and error thing ambiguous, as the person who commits a crime shall
have the will and intent toward the commission of the crime and at the same time
happens act as a result of another error.
The fundamental problem Search lies in the dialectical given to the mental
element in crimes translational intent, where debate has raged in the law as well as
in Islamic law where the meeting about how the intent with the error in the corner
of a moral one? That is strange and rare nor imagine the mind nor logic nor the law
sometimes.
So we had to accept the idea that the offender be deliberate and wrong at the
same criminal activity and is hard to believe, especially that the legislation did not
clearly disclose this philosophy task that came out jurisprudence French and
Islamic law before.
Therefore, we assume in our research that the logical explanation for the exit
condition is acceptable between crimes translational outcome ((translational
intent)), such as murder and abuse intentional, but rather lies in the acceptance of
the idea of exceeding mayors and error in the corner of a moral one and the need to
justify that legal justification, and we have adopted the style of response theoretical
ideas and arguments in line with the title search, content and style comparison to
Islamic law and the adoption of comparative research on the style Islamic law was
necessary and important.