Machine summary:
"Shia does not consider analogy to be a valid tool for inferring Islamic laws whereas it plays an important role in many Sunni legal traditions, forming the basis of much of Sunni jurisprudence.
In case, we consider both of the two principles as one, in view of the texts and arguments, the generality of the principle of tajavoz will encompass all fiqh subject, including taharat(purity), diyat(penalties), contracts, one-sided legal act, worship acts and the religious laws.
Keywords: hajj, rule, capability, argument, intention, seeking nearness, halal property, haram property, rationale, effects.
Thereupon the viewpoints of Western and Muslim intellectuals concerning the validity and authoritativeness of the outward meanings of religious texts have been explained with the views of the opponents assessed and criticized.
Keywords: Isalat al-Zuhur, hermeneutics, the outward meaning, non-detailed, text, religious knowledge, approval of readings, authoritativeness.
This article seeks to know the jurisprudential rules of one of these contracts named option contract which is a transaction in which the right of transaction of stocks or other properties are relegated to another person.
He presupposes the validity of selling property right from a jurisprudential perspective and with this he analyzes and conducts a critical assessment of the arguments for validity and invalidity of option contract as a result of which he concludes that option transaction in the form of a sale contract is void because the rules concerning sale contract are not applicable to it."