چکیده:
The aim of this study was to investigate organizational factors affecting administrativefinancial
Brfsad at the level of administrative staff. The aim of this study from the
perspective of applied and how to obtain field data, as well as the study of data correlation.
The population of this study includes all offices and agencies of the country. The random
statistical sample size was estimated using the number 321 362 Table Jersey Morgan were
gathered. It is also a random cluster sampling. Using the questionnaire used in the research
literature review and questionnaire huge et al (1390) has been designed. Its reliability by
using Cronbach's alpha coefficient was approved and its validity was confirmed by content.
Data collected were analyzed using SPSS 22 software, Pearson correlation coefficient and
multiple regression were used. The results showed that all aspects of the organizational
structure of dysfunction, poor organizational culture, administrative corruption are financial.
The lack of transparency in the conduct of affairs (425/0 = r and 0001/0 = p) and weak
monitoring and control (321/0 = r and 0001/0 = p) is a significant relationship. The results
showed a lack of transparency in the conduct of affairs in anticipation of the largest financial
administrative corruption
خلاصه ماشینی:
Transparency International's Corruption; transparency in the conduct of affairs, effective monitoring Perception Index for 2012 shows that corruption continues; and control of administrative-financial level On corruption to roam the world in countries and communities.
09 / 0- 01/0 = partial correlation 29 / -0 1/0 = low correlation 49 / -0 3/0 = moderate correlation 69 / 0- 5/0 = high correlation 99 / -0 7/0 = very high correlation 1 = perfect correlation 3-1-1-first hypothesis: the dimensions of a lack of transparency in the financial affairs administrative corruption in the offices there is a significant relationship.
Table 3 shows the correlation between the lack of transparency in the conduct of administrative and financial corruption [%%ابتدای جدول%%; Descriptive; The significance; The correlation; variable; ; correlational; level (p); coefficient (r) ; Average; 0.
relationship between the lack of transparency in conducting; 3-1-2-second hypothesis: the dimensions of supervision the corruption-financial affairs Pearson correlation test; and poor control corruption-financial institutions there Shd. hman As Table 3 shows, Unresponsive (322/0 = r and; is a significant relationship.
The results showed a lack of transparency in the conduct of affairs has Moosavi and Gholami [%%ابتدای جدول%%UCT Journal of Management and Accounting StudiesVol 5 Issue 1, March 2017 ; Table 4 shows the correlation of poor monitoring and control of corruption-financial; ; Descriptive; The significance; Thecorrelation; variable ; correlational; level (p); coefficient (r) ; down; 0.