چکیده:
Distinguishing economic science from economicschool, the author suggests that economic science explains and interprets economic phenomena, while economic school shows economic lifestyle. In this perspective, the task of economic science is to analyze and describe an economic phenomenon while the task of economic school is to place value on such phenomenon based on Islamic precepts especially Justice. Given the aforementioned issues, the author seeks to address the reciprocity between economics and economic school and tries to answer the question that whether the method of recognition ls entirely different in these two fields or there ls an interaction between them. The author concludes that it ls possible to explain the concepts inherent in economic school based on scientific knowledge and methods of economic science, and to provide models, derived from them, for economic decision-making based on religious teachings. The author believes that the interaction
خلاصه ماشینی:
Given the assumption that human taste is invariant during the period under study, change in decisions is attributed to change in resource availability'" Since both independent and dependent variables are observable, economists using partial derivation consider every change in decisions as function of a change in the level of available resources and study these relations by scientific method/" Of course, they use reasoning and arguments to show for example that change in the volume of purchases made by consumers has taken place as a result of change in the price of goods or income or in the level of available resources.
From here it is clear that a knowledge called Islamic economic science is not possible;'!" if any exploration based on any school reaches the stage of judgment and conducts a conditional behavioral prediction and this prediction passes successfully the empirical tests, this exploration will be a positive economic research not a normative study.
Islamic economists could formulate the first stage based on· the guidance of Islam, for example; they first formulate a model for explaining the Koranic doctrine that alms (Sadaqat) promote growth and development, but usury (Riba) leads to recession and poverty (Sura Baghara: 276), and then try to find an observable and refutable relation between these concepts, and finally test this relationship against facts, it could then be said that they have conducted a scientific and positive and Galbraith, believe that studies in economic sciences are a mixture of both.