بررسی عقلانیت سیاست گذاری آموزشی: مطالعه موردی طرح انتخاب مدیران مدارس با رأی معلمان مقالة

پژوهش حاضر بصورت کیفی انجام شده است و روش جمع آوری داده ها میدانی ـ مصاحبه ای غیر ساختارمند است، برای اینکه اطلاعات بدست آمده از یک مصاحبه غیر ساختارمند بر خلاف مصاحبه ساختارمند که احتمال مناسکی شدن در آن بیشتر است؛کاملاً خودانگیخته است و انطباق بیشتری با واقعیت دارد.قصد بر آن است که جامعه مورد نمونه، مناسب اهداف تحقیق باشد.بنابراین از نمونه گیری قضاوتی و در دسترس که از طرح های نمونه گیری غیر تصادفی هدفمندتر است، استفاده شده است.روش تحلیل داده ها نیز به دلیل ماهیت پژوهش تجزیه و تحلیل کیفی خواهد بود.پژوهش حاضر با تکیه بر تئوری عقلانیت چهارگانه اسنلن(عقلانیت اقتصادی، سیاسی، حقوقی و حرفه ای) به عنوان سازه نظری، به طور موردی به مطالعه طرح انتخاب مدیران با رأی دبیران پرداخته است..یافته های پژوهش نشان می دهد که بجز عقلانیت قانونی که در حد متوسط بوده بقیه عقلانیت ها بسیار بالا بوده و این طرح، طرح بسیار خوبی بوده که نیاز هست دوباره اجرا شود و اشکالات آن برطرف گردد.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the rationality of public policy making in education. Because policy making in education has been successful in some areas, other fields are in crisis. Of all the types of management, management over education organizations is of particular importance and has a strategic role. Because all the goals and factors of these organizations are human. If other community organizations fail in fulfilling their mission and goals, The results are directly attributable to the group or organization they are dealing with. But if the education agency and its managers are ignorant of the nature of the work, their work will be addressed to society in ethical, social and economic terms, and Will have a significant impact on the growth and development of the community or its decline and decline. Is and must be familiar with the essential goals and tasks and management skills required, especially in building human relationships. In 2002, the Higher Education Council adopted a decree appointing school principals by teachers or teachers of each school. By implementing this instruction, decision-making was transferred from the highest levels of the system to the lower levels, and the teachers were able to choose. Managers participate. Given the importance of education managers in the country's education and development, and the discussion of the selection of principals who have been the focus of education in recent years, a new plan is needed. The selection of principals by teachers throughout the country and at all levels of study is reviewed; To this end, we aimed to identify the desirability, strengths and weaknesses and suggested solutions for managers to improve and redesign their plan and execution, and by summarizing information, strategies to improve and implement each. What is more, it is desirable for the authorities to use the results of this research to improve the quality of the project and address its weaknesses and to strive to improve the management of schools and the educational status of the country. The structure of the research is based on the views of Eugene Snellen; the research question will be answered. The model has four dimensions of economic, political, legal, and professional (scientific) rationality, each of which constitutes a kind of rationality. There is no clear understanding of the concept of rationality. Any commentator on the subject that is rationality is definitively presenting his argument. The type of rationality and reasoning are more important than the rationality and rationality principle. The sovereignty and the political elite in some way enjoy the principle of reasoning and thinking, in other words, a sovereignty that is not Chocolates and issues of their own society do not have rationality and thinking. But there is a considerable gap between sovereigns in terms of how they think and reason, which has led to different policies and then to the different strategic fates of different societies. The method of data collection is library-structured interviewing. Unstructured Because the information gained from an unstructured interview is completely spontaneous and more consistent with reality than the structured interview is more likely to be. The interview is a common research data collection technique or tool that Some scholars consider it to be the most important and best tool for gathering information. The statistical population of the research will be the elite of the four areas of rationality. Breeding and MPs will come. For three More volts to reach the elites, the community will be limited to Abadan education and MPs. The size of each elite group will be limited to six to maintain the quality and quantity of research. Experienced secretaries and directors and officials of the Islamic Consultative Assembly will be interviewed regarding the four areas of policy rationality. The sample population is intended to be suitable for the purpose of the research. Judicial and accessible sampling, which is more targeted than non-random sampling schemes, is therefore used. will be. The method of data analysis will also be due to the nature of the qualitative analysis research. The method of data collection has been field-interview and qualitative information analysis method. 1. Economic rationality: Analyzing data on economic rationality indicates that economic rationality has been very high in the selection of managers by the vote of secretaries. Students ranked the interviewees in three important respects, respectively, that reflect the education policy maker's attention to this area of ​​rationality. Economic rationality is the prelude to teachers' acceptance of education policies. , Meet the financial needs of the editors Browsing the mainstream loses motivation and leaves the organization. 2. Political rationality: Analyzing data on political rationality shows that the opinions of government officials and MPs have decreased but instead the sympathy and convergence of the secretaries has increased. This plan has been able to garner support and elite support. Increase the presence of teachers and students in the political scene. Therefore, the project has been subject to high political rationality. 3. Legal Rationality: The data analysis shows that compliance with legal rationality is not as much considered as economic rationality. Although correct execution with a score of 7 at the top of the statements indicates education for legal security, but the statements Next, the lack of consistency with other schemes and the exception, indicate that education has ignored some components of legal rationality at the implementation stage and has, to a certain extent, increased discrimination amongst teachers. It has been average. 4. Professional rationality: A review of the information obtained shows that professional rationality has been very high in the selection of managers by the votes of the secretaries. As you can see in Table 7, the propositions about meritocracy, increased motivation for teachers, the use of psychological theories, and attention to research on the project were the most rewarding indicators of high professional rationality. The results show that, except for the legal rationality that was moderate, the rest of the rationality was very high. In fact, the plan was one of the very successful ones that was implemented, but I don't know why it stopped suddenly and hoped that Implement this plan again. Key words: public policy, political rationality, economic rationality, rationality, professional rationality, choice of managers.

بررسي عقلانيت سياست گذاري آموزشي : مطالعه موردي طرح انتخاب مديران بارأي معلمان محمد مکوندي ١ دريافت مقاله : ١٣٩٧/٠٥/٢٦ صفحات : ١٠٧-٨٢ Received: 17/08/2018 پذيرش مقاله : ١٣٩٨/٠٢/٢٨ Accepted: 18/06/2019 چکيده پژوهش حاضر به صورت کيفي انجام شده است و روش جمع آوري داده ها ميداني ـ مصاحبه اي غير ساختارمند است ، براي اينکه اطلاعات به دست آمده از يک مصاحبه غير ساختارمند برخلاف مصاحبه ساختارمند که احتمال مناسکي شدن در آن بيشتر است ؛کاملا خودانگيخته است و انطباق بيشتري با واقعيت دارد. با توجه به اهميتي که مديران آموزشي در امر تعليم و تربيت و پيشرفت کشور بر عهده دارند و بحث انتخاب شايسته ي مديران که در سال هاي اخير توجه دست اندرکاران تعليم و تربيت را به خود مشغول داشته است ، لازم است طرح جديد انتخاب مديران به وسيله دبيران در سراسر کشور و در تمام مقاطع تحصيلي موردبررسي قرار گيرد؛ ازاين رو به همين منظور بر آن شديم تا با انجام اين پروژه ، ميزان مطلوبيت ، نقاط قوت و نقاط ضعف و راهکارهاي پيشنهادي مديران را براي بهبود طرح و اجراي مطلوب تر و دوباره آن مشخص نموده و با جمع بندي اطلاعات ، راهکارهايي براي اصلاح و اجراي هر چه مطلوب تر آن ارائه نماييم تا مسئولان از نتايج اين پژوهش براي کيفيت بخشي به طرح و رفع نقاط ضعف آن استفاده نمايند و براي بهبود مديريت مدارس و وضع آموزشي کشور تلاش نمايند.