خلاصة:
تنوع زبانی یکی از بحث‌های چالش‌برانگیز در زبان‌شناسی اجتماعی است. نگارنده در پژوهش حاضر به بحث تنوع زبانی در ترجمه‌های فارسی صادق هدایت و فرزانه طاهری از کتاب مسخ اثر فرانتس کافکا پرداخته است. پرسش‌های اساسی در این پژوهش عبارت است از: 1) نقش جنسیت در تنوع واژگانی در دو ترجمۀ کتاب مسخ چگونه است؟ 2) تنوع واژگانی بیشتر در کدام‌یک از اجزای کلام بیشتر صورت می‌گیرد؟ 3) نقش جنسیت در تنوع نحوی در دو ترجمۀ کتاب مسخ چگونه است؟ 4) چه رابطه‌ای بین جنسیت و فرایندهای نحوی دخیل در تنوع نحوی وجود دارد؟ یافته‌های پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که جنسیت نقش اساسی در تنوع زبانی ازجمله واژگانی، صرفی و نحوی را در زبان فارسی ایفا می‌کند. یافته‌های پژوهش حاکی از آن است که تعداد کل تنوعات واژگانی 505 مورد بوده است. از این تعداد کل تنوع واژگانی، سهم هر یک از تنوعات اجزای کلام ازجمله تنوع فعلی 398 مورد، تنوع اسمی 51 مورد، تنوع صفتی 39 مورد و تنوع قیدی 17 مورد بوده است. بررسی داده‌های پژوهش حاکی از آن است که میزان تنوع صرفی در مقایسه با تنوعات واژگانی و نحوی بسیار پایین بوده است. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که رابطۀ تنگاتنگی بین متغیر اجتماعی جنسیت و متغیرهای نحوی ازجمله قلب نحوی، کاربرد افزوده‌ها، کاربرد ادات استفهام، سببی‌سازی، موصولی‌سازی، حرکت بند موصولی و ناهم‌پایه‌سازی وجود دارد. یکی از پیامدهای اصلی پژوهش حاضر این است که تعامل تنگاتنگی بین زبان‌شناسی اجتماعی و دستور زایشی وجود دارد و بنابراین نتایج پژوهش حاضر دیدگاه‌های زبان‌شناسان اجتماعی ازجمله سلز و همکاران (1996) و باربیرز (2002) را دربارۀ تعامل بین زبان‌شناسی اجتماعی و دستور زایشی تأیید می‌کند.
Linguistic variation is one of the challengeable themes in sociolinguistics. The researcher discusses linguistic variation in Persian translations The Metamorphosis by Franz Kafka Translated into Persian by Sadegh Hedayat and Farzaneh Taheri. The main questions in the present research are: 1) How is the role of gender in producing lexical variation in these two translations of The Metamorphosis? 2) In which parts of speech does it take place lexical variation more than others? 3) How is the role of gender in producing syntactic variation in two translation of The Metamorphosis? 4) Are there any relationships between gender and syntactic processes concerning the syntactic variations? The results of research indicate that gender has crucial role in producing linguistic variation including lexical, morphological and syntactic variations in Persian language. The results indicate that there are 505 lexical variations in two translations in which the number of verbal, nominal, adjective, and adverbial variations is 398, 51, 39, 17, respectively. The investigation of data indicates that the rate of morphological variation is less than lexical and syntactic variations. Also, the results indicate that there are relationships between gender and syntactic variables such as scrambling, adjuncts application, question particle application, grammatical metaphor of nominalization, grammatical metaphor of modality, causation, relativization, extraposition, grammatical metaphor of transitivity, and subordination shifting. One of the main implications of present research is that there is close interface between sociolinguistics and generative grammar and therefore, the results of present research confirm the opinions of sociolinguists such as Sells et al. (1996) and Barbiers(2002) about interface between sociolinguistics and generative grammar
1. Introduction
Linguistic variation is one of the challengeable themes in sociolinguistics. In the contemporary literature of sociolinguistics, one of important paradigm resulting amalgam of sociolinguistic paradigm and generative paradigm emerged. The supporters of this paradigm believe that only integrative theory of syntactic variation including generative and sociolinguistic paradigm can explain the syntactic variations. Variation theory needs formal theory for description and explanation of grammatical characterization of syntactic variations and determination of location of variation in speakers’ grammars. Generative theory and sociolinguistics are complementary in the integrative theory of syntactic variations. The task of sociolinguistics is to explain patterns of variation based on social variables such as gender, social class, age, education in the speech community and the task of generative theory is to discover the constraints of syntactic variations. The present research is one of the newest one in discussing about syntactic variations based on integrated theory in Persian texts. The researcher discusses linguistic variation in Persian translations of the book entitled as The Metamorphosis compiled by Franz Kafka that is translated by Sadegh Hedayat and Farzaneh Taheri. The main questions in the present research are: 1) How is the role of gender in producing lexical variation in these two translations of The Metamorphosis? 2) In which parts of speech does it take place lexical variation more than others? 3) How is the role of gender in producing syntactic variation in two translation of The Metamorphosis? 4) Are there any relationships between gender and syntactic processes concerning the syntactic variations? The results of research indicate that gender has vital role in producing linguistic variation including lexical, morphological and syntactic variations in Persian language. The results indicate that there are 505 lexical variations in two translations in which the number of verbal, nominal, adjective, and adverbial variations is 398, 51, 39, 17, respectively. The investigation of data indicates that the rate of morphological variation is less than lexical and syntactic variations. Also, the results indicate that there are relationships between gender and syntactic variables such as scrambling, adjuncts application, question particle application, grammatical metaphor of nominalization, grammatical metaphor of modality, causation, relativization, extraposition, grammatical metaphor of transitivity, and subordination shifting. One of the main implications of present research is that there is close interface between sociolinguistics and generative grammar and therefore, the results of present research confirm the opinions of sociolinguists such as Sells et al. (1996) and Barbiers (2002) about interface between sociolinguistics and generative grammar
(
, 
, 
)
