خلاصة:
This paper aimed at manifesting the role of significant attributes of conversation analysis in social interviews from a functional perspective. In this paper the concern would be on how these attributes of conversation analysis acted as important elements in analyzing the interviews. In particular, the author discussed some samples of B.B.C learning English interviews which considered some conversation ways and then analyzed it in order to find best solutions of how these techniques could be more effective. Moreover, in this paper, analyzing these features of conversation analysis in interview sections derived from the organization of the speech exchange system and of the types of actions sanctioned. Furthermore, utilizing this kind of didactic application such as B.B.C learning English and applied solutions in conversations highlighted the purpose of study. Finally, the results of the study indicates that, these features of conversation analysis can influence on the ways of using attributes in different situations and English learners can exploit the methods in their daily conversations and apply them in the best way.
ملخص الجهاز:
Since this kind of analysis is a method for studying and probing the structure and process of social talk in interaction, it emphasizes the talk, describe how people take turns in conversations and investigates the details of talk which became affected through an important attributes; as tum-taking, adjacency pairs and repair.
Whereas many CA studies worked on topic actions in some institutional environment, the conversation analytical of this paper highlighted the fundamental aspects of this organization which include tum-taking, adjacency pairs and repair; in relation to general ways in each sequence of social interview and how the participants manage their utterances through this action.
Regarding conversation analysis in educational setting, McHoul (1987) examined examples of volitional and non-volitional formal classrooms and presented a set of tum-taking rules concluded from Sack et al (1974) and as a result, he summarized that only teachers can conduct speakership in any active method.
In connection with conversation analysis in language proficiency assessment, Seed house and Egbert (2006) examined 137 recorded IELTS speaking test and stated that in terms of producing incomprehensible turns by candidates, modes of applying repairs differed significantly from interaction in classroom or university settings to international language proficiency tests.
3. Results Regarding application of tum-taking, adjacency pairs and repair sentences, in line 1 and 2, Rob asked Neil a question as well as using an insertion sequence as repair to clarify the meaning of threat in previous line.
In line 7 and 8, Rob employed second type of tum-taking aspect and also adjacency pair by asking question from Neil.